1  ? text handling

Aerial view
of the dry lake
in Oregon, 1990

 What is the Sri Chakra yantra

We could spend a life­time try­ing to comprehend the mean­ing, con­tents and po­ten­tial of this cos­mic scheme, with­out ever ex­haust­ing its sense, since its vir­tu­al con­text tran­scends all our pos­si­ble cog­ni­tive ho­ri­zons.

An em­blem that has nei­ther be­gin­ning nor end, since it re­presents in a su­preme and per­fect math­e­mat­i­cal and ge­o­met­ric syn­the­sis - hencee more than sci­en­tif­ic, al­though still mis­un­der­stood - cre­a­tion and Cre­a­tion it­self, or ra­ther the dis­positive Law that lies a­head.
I re­trace its self-pro­pelled fea­tures on this page as I write, and it seems to say to me: "I AM"; it is as if it were re­flected in me, that I con­tem­plate IT.

Ig­nor­ing oth­er or­i­gins de­fined in space and time con­ceived by us, the hu­man scho­las­tic who in­her­it­ed it - with­out re­mem­ber­ing when or how - o­beys the nat­u­ral need to ap­pro­pri­ate it, giv­ing it a name that ab­solves its pres­ence in the earth­ly con­text, where­u­pon re­de­fine it in a­gree­ment with var­i­ous doc­trines - as is done with the same con­cept of God - giv­en the ex­traor­di­nary op­por­tu­ni­ty to use them for the ben­e­fit of one's teach­ings.

Just as is for the con­cept of God it­self, there are those who be­lieve and those who do not be­lieve: if the for­mer are most­ly in­duced to trust in an im­age that they built on a hu­man scale, or that was made for them, it would be e­nough for oth­ers to re­al­ize that by not be­liev­ing in an­y­thing, they claim not to be­lieve even in their own ex­ist­ence, since this is GOD; and it is the task of our po­ten­tial to re­con­nect and man­i­fest It, what is clear­ly re­presented in the re­cent Let­ters dic­tated by Christ 'in per­son', com­men­su­rate with our cur­rent ev­o­lu­tion­ary de­gree.
This yantra is its in­stru­ment par ex­cel­lence, ca­pa­ble more than any oth­er of vi­brat­ing the a­ware­ness of this, to those who will be able to grasp it.

A win­dow on the im­mense.

I do not in­tend to in­ter­pose my­self, nor to pro­vide es­o­ter­ic de­tails con­nect­ed to any mys­ti­cal or mag­i­cal prac­tice; what the read­er will be able to draw by the Web a­bun­dant­ly, in more than one lan­guage.

This sym­bol cross­es all pos­si­ble lev­els of a­ware­ness and know­ledge, reach­a­ble and not, de­pend­ing on the de­gree of in­ner de­vel­op­ment and ­/ or in­i­ti­a­tion - when it ex­ists - of the per­son who talks a­bout it.

Our aim

The task I set my­self in this area is to make a­vail­a­ble and un­der­stand­a­ble e­nough, a med­i­ta­tion tool de­sired by the SPIR­IT and made nine years ago, fin­ish­ing the first dy­nam­ic(° & ex­act(° ex­e­cu­tion of its graph­ic lay­out - a goal which for its com­plex­i­ty and lin­e­ar­i­ty at the same time, has kept and kept many schol­ars in check for cen­tu­ries.
The fi­nal so­lu­tion is due to the THE­O­RY pro­ce­dure, which from De­cem­ber 2009 has been de­scribed and a­vail­a­ble at the Web do­main https:­/­/eye-of-rev­e­la­tion.org (site still only in I­tal­ian). How­ev­er, it is good to keep in mind that all the work so far op­ti­mized by any means ... will still re­quire ad­justments and pa­tient in­ter­ven­tions.
It re­presents only ex­am­ples, a­mong the many pos­si­ble ways of ap­proaching and deal­ing with the top­ic.

Yard / Yantra

It deals with a so spe­cial fig­ure that can­not be plotted with­out a com­pu­ter, and like­ly not even with this if not i­de­al­ly.
Un­like any oth­er fig­ure based on ir­ra­tion­al val­ues, such as some pol­y­gons and their der­i­va­tions - the Gold­en Sec­tion it­self - it does not seem pos­si­ble to com­plete it by fol­low­ing a pre­or­dained se­quence of ge­o­met­ric steps, that's to say rul­er and com­pass; be­cause the so­lu­tion is not u­ni­vo­cal, like that of a square or a pen­ta­gon, but ra­ther prof­fers a po­ten­tial­ly un­lim­it­ed range - as if to mean that it can con­tract and ex­pand in a myr­i­ad of forms, all per­fect­i­ble to the most im­pec­ca­ble ex­act­ness, and PUL­SAT­ING - read vi­brant - in res­o­nance ac­cord with the per­en­ni­al em­a­na­tion of UN­CON­DI­TION­AL LOVE of the CRE­A­TIVE UNIT.
That should dis­suade all those who strive to pro­pose pre-set and de­ci­sive pat­terns.

mean­ing and ra­tio of the ac­ro­nym THE­O­RY

The ac­tu­al u­ni­verse is not in­fi­nite.

It is the high­est and most com­plete state of Be­ing that we can con­ceive of, and as such it is cir­cum­scribed, even though its bound­a­ries ­/ ho­ri­zons es­cape any pos­si­ble earth­ly in­ves­ti­ga­tion.
It has a pur­pose and a func­tion: to re­in­te­grate into the Cos­mic Light Con­scious­ness, from which its tran­si­to­ry na­ture has drawn vir­tu­al per­fec­tion and con­sist­en­cy.

The struc­tur­al ex­pe­ri­ence of the Big Bang could not have giv­en rise to an in­fi­nite or e­ter­nal re­al­i­ty since eve­ry­thing that has a be­gin­ning has an end, in space and time; only its Source 'be­yond' is e­ter­nal, how­so­ev­er you want to call it, since the BE of BE­ING has no Name. As is e­ter­nal our Re­al­i­ty, which is not lim­it­ed to a body made of bones, or­gans and nerves.
For this rea­son the 'yard' lem­ma was sug­gested to me: en­clo­sure, but also fi­na­lized op­er­a­tion­al area, court and more.
On our side, the Big Bang ex­pressed the po­ten­tial of such an ab­so­lute In­tel­li­gence as to ex­plode into the cha­os a u­ni­verse of un­dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed par­ti­cles, in­tend­ed to re­com­pose its es­sence and ex­ist­ence - with ex­treme ef­fi­cien­cy in the free­dom, where 'pos­i­tive'­/'neg­a­tive' means: for each ac­tion an e­qual and op­po­site re-ac­tion - up to the Di­vine Bal­ance, man­i­festing the 'Christ Con­scious­ness' in the bi­no­mi­al In­tel­li­gent-will | Pur­pose­ful-love-. For this rea­son THE­O­RY ab­solves and re­solves bet­ter than any oth­er sym­bol the her­met­ic mys­tery of the Rose + Cross!
The prin­ci­ple is of el­e­men­ta­ry par­a­digms, for the in­ter­ac­tion of which the u­ni­verse de­vel­ops and e­volves in all its com­ponents, di­rec­tions and re­cesses, from the sim­ple a­tom­ic struc­ture, to DNA, to stel­lar sets.
Em­blem­a­tized and reg­u­lat­ed by the im­pec­ca­ble, un­as­sail­a­ble and not sub­vertible con­struct of the Sri Chak­ra.
As yantra thus THE­O­RY sym­bol­izes­/is The Holy Eye Of Rev­e­la­tion, aimed to those who be­come a­ware of it: The-Holy-Eye-Of-Rev­e­la­tion-Yantra (the in­stru­ment) re­presents The-Holy-Eye-Of-Rev­e­la­tion-Yard (the struc­ture).
This is an ex­pres­sion rare­ly used and may­be even less un­der­stood, but so be it: stud­y­ing in depth this con­text, the right sense will e­merge.
Med­i­tate on the Eye? per­haps it is worth think­ing of that of a cy­clone: the cen­tral area marked by rel­a­tive calm, a­round which eve­ry­thing wraps, or un­folds, spin­ning at very high speed and in­ten­si­ty…
Per­son­al­ly I pre­fer to re­fer to "Yard", as it sat­is­fi­es a cog­ni­tion of con­crete or­der, not in­stru­men­tal; since med­i­tat­ing is our task, but the com­po­si­tion of the sym­bol goes far be­yond!